This website uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. Please read our Privacy Policy for more information on what information we gather and how it is used.

Analyzing the Long COVID Conversation Using AI

News
April 9, 2026

When the COVID-19 pandemic first struck in Jan 2020, the mainstream advice from our governments and medical institutions focused on the dangers of acute infection.  Either you survive, or you don’t.

Yet a conversation began online in those early months. Some people were not recovering from their COVID infection - including those with mild initial illness, and those who didn’t fit into any of the categories deemed by our governments to be “high risk.” 

Eventually the term “Long COVID” emerged, as patients created an online space to discuss a brand new disease that hadn’t existed before.

Who is the Long COVID Community?  

What have people been saying about the disease since 2020, and how has that conversation changed over time?

We built a data tool to answer these questions. We analyzed tweets mentioning Long COVID from Jan. 2020 through Nov. 2025.  

Here’s what we learned:

From Jan 2020- Nov 2025 we found 32K unique authors mentioned Long COVID over time, with a total of 89K tweets.  

The majority of these tweets were from patients and other non-medical professionals.

Medical professionals made up only 3.7% of total people posting. However, when they did post, they did so 77% more often, at an average of 4.6 tweets per individual.  Non-medical professionals, by contrast, posted an average of 2.6 times each.

These dynamics reflect the way Long COVID as a condition first emerged. At the start of the pandemic, our governments and mainstream medical institutions weren’t expecting post-acute sequelae for the disease.  

However, it was the patient community who first began to raise the alarm. People who’d survived their acute infection, and perhaps even had a mild acute infection, but did not return to health. People who, in some cases, were more sick 6 months to a year after their initial infection, than they were initially.  

Doctors didn’t know what to tell them - and in many cases, patients’ symptoms were dismissed. 

So we would expect this conversation, for the most part, to be led by patients. The Long COVID community has fought every step of the way for answers - and much of the advocacy has happened online.  

Changes over time

Looking back over the past 5+ years, our data lets us see how the conversation has shifted over time.  

2022-2023 were peak for posting about Long COVID:

chart from Jan 2020 to April 2025 showing new authors posting about LC for the first time.  The highest level is late 2022, with levels declining on either side of that time point
New authors per month

The majority of people posting about Long COVID did so before 2023, although the cumulative number of people who’ve ever posted about Long COVID continues to rise

Chart shows the level rise frrom 0 in Jan 2020 to roughly 33K in Nov 2025
Cumulative community size: Total unique authors to ever post about LC

Who leads the conversation?  

If we look at the frequency of posts dating back to 2020, there is a fairly broad distribution.  

The majority of posters (69%) posted just once.

chart measuring number of LC tweets per author.  The majority at 23K posted once.  Just under 5 posted twice, 2.5 K posted 3-4 times, and the level continues to decline from there.

Meanwhile, 0.1% of authors (45 people) are the "Champions" posting 101+ tweets — yet they account for 10% of all content. 

engagement tier breakdown: text ingraphic shows 22,978 posted once (69.7% of total), 7,603 posted once (23.1%) of total, 2,015 posted 6-25 times (61 of total), 339 posted 2-100 times (1% of all) and 45 posted more than 100 times (0.1% of all)

Over time we’ve seen a shift where the conversation has become more concentrated within a smaller number of authors posting more regularly.

When you look at the data we collected, you can see that the number of individual overall authors (purple) goes down over time, while the volume of tweets (pink) actually goes up each year.

Bar graph showing authors vs total LC tweets for each year.  2020: 2K authors, nearly 1K tweets, 2021 3.8K authors, nearlyy 2K tweets

2025: Fewer Voices, More Volume

2025 had fewer new authors (3,677) than any year since 2021 — yet it had the highest tweet volume ever (29,018). The conversation is concentrating into a smaller, louder core.

Why?

We know the number of total Long COVID cases continues to rise, as new people unfortunately develop this condition every day.  It is still a threat. 

So why would there be fewer individuals posting about Long COVID now?

We can think of a few reasons:

Perception of COVID as Public Health Risk

2023 officially marked the end of the public health emergency worldwide. While we know these declarations had more to do with economic policy than scientific reality, the fact is that the public’s perception of SARS-CoV-2 as a risk has gone down.  People are simply not paying attention to Long COVID the way they once were.

Additionally, lockdowns are over.  Even people who may still be concerned with COVID-19 and Long COVID have, in many cases, needed to return to work and school in person, by necessity. They are simply not able to spend as much time online engaging with the Long COVID community, even though it may deeply matter to them.

Trends in X usage

Additionally, X ownership changed hands in late 2022 as Elon Musk bought the platform.  Many users announced they were leaving the platform in objection to Musk’s vocal stances on many social and political issues.  

According to the Wall Street Journal, by Sept. 2023 X had lost 16% of its user base.  In contrast, other social platforms saw growth over the previous year, including Snapchat (+11%), Instagram (+8%), and TikTok (+3%).

Musk and X have since faced similar controversies, with additional users quitting the platform in protest of Musk’s political activities following the 2024 US Presidential election. 

X is also now facing a lawsuit over its “Grok” feature allegedly allowing users to create pornographic images of individuals - including children. 

Various polls show that X usage continues to drop. From 2024-2025, X usage among 18-29 year olds - the single biggest group of social media users fell from 42% to 33%

So it may be that the decline in #LongCOVID-related posts reflects a decline in people using the app overall, at least in part. 

Dedicated authors take center stage

Our data shows that the Long COVID conversation has crystallized over time.  As of 2025, we now see a smaller number of authors posting very frequently about Long COVID

These trends suggest that perhaps it is the authors who are the most motivated (and most able) to post frequently on a specific topic that are becoming authority figures in their online niche.

The X algorithm may also have a lot to do with this, in terms of whose content appears in users’ feed, and how it promotes certain authors based on their engagement.

Additionally, it may be that it’s truly the most motivated authors who are likely to sign onto the app and create content, whereas more casual users are more likely to simply browse.

Where do we go from here? 

While X is certainly flawed as a platform, we recognize its historical relevance in raising awareness of Long COVID, 

At Long COVID Labs, we believe the conversation about Long COVID is important to have.  Conversations between patients about what has and hasn’t worked have motivated many of the clinical trials going on today.  

In addition, new people continue to develop Long COVID every day.  Our online communities provide a safety net, sharing collective knowledge of what has worked so far.  

A thank you

As a way of expressing our gratitude to those who have led the Long COVID conversation, we have awarded Long COVID Labs points to the accounts our AI tool identified as sharing important LC information.

Depending on how many times you posted, each user has been awarded a certain number of points which can be redeemed for Long COVID Labs governance tokens.

These governance tokens allow you to take part in our system of collective governance.  

We want to hear from Long COVID patients on which are the most promising treatments you think we should fund, and how you’d like to see the team focus our energy as we move forward. 

How to claim your points: 

For the Long COVID patients on X, you can download our Long COVID Moonshot app and connect your X account. 

The app is available here for both iOS and Android.

We’ve pre-populated your account with points based on the number of tweets identified by our AI tool, and you’ll be able to see them on your account once you log into the app. 

Screenshot from the app, showing a menu sidebar.  Next to "Wallet" it shows 1010 points.
Screenshot from the Long COVID Moonshot App

We’ll be sharing more info on how to redeem these for tokens moving forward!

Treatment data

In our next post, we’ll be sharing the data our AI tool collected about the most promising Long COVID treatments so far - and how information can be used to spur future research priorities.  

Thank you all for being part of this important conversation, and creating a community for a disease which, in the beginning, did not even have a name.

Stay tuned for more data analysis coming up!